In City of N. Tonawando v. Penn Power Group, LLC, 77 CA 24-01685, 2026 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1800 (4th Dept. Mar. 20, 2026), the Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Fourth Department (Appellate Court), considered whether the defendant’s motion to dismiss should be granted on the grounds that the breach of warranty was time-barred by the statute of limitations and the plaintiff’s negligence claims were barred by the economic loss doctrine (ELD). The Appellate Court agreed with the defendant that the breach of warranty claim was barred by the statute of limitations and that the ELD barred the plaintiff’s negligence claims.
With respect to the breach of warranty claim, the Appellate Court found that the defendant met its initial burden of establishing that the 4-year statute of limitations in the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) 2-725 had expired. The burden then shifted to the plaintiff to establish that the statute of limitations had not expired. The court found that the plaintiff failed to allege – beyond speculation and conjecture – that an express warranty of future performance was a made. Thus, the Appellate Court found that plaintiff failed to allege evidentiary facts showing that this case fell within an exception to the 4-year statute of limitations.
Considering the economic loss question, the court stated that pursuant to the ELD, “a plaintiff may not recover in tort against a manufacture for economic loss that is contractually based, whether due to injury to the product itself or consequential damages flowing therefrom.” In this case, the plaintiff alleged only economic loss arising out of damage to the product itself and consequential damages, i.e., damage to the truck and the truck’s replacement cost. The Appellate Court, therefore, found that the plaintiff’s negligence causes of action were barred by the ELD.
The case reminds subrogation professionals that, when in New York, they should consider not only the UCC’s statute of limitations for breach of warranty claims and whether an exception applies based on further performance. They should also consider the impact of the ELD on a subrogor’s negligence claims.
Recent Posts
Categories
- Products Liability
- Statute of Limitations-Repose
- Subrogation
- CPSC Recalls
- Contracts
- Construction Defects
- Experts – Daubert
- Florida
- Litigation
- New York
- Economic Loss Rule
- Pennsylvania
- Arizona
- Arbitration
- Evidence
- Negligence
- Experts - Reliability
- Texas
- Minnesota
- Damages
- New Jersey
- Experts
- AIA Contracts
- Indiana
- Comparative Fault
- Illinois
- Internet Terms
- Right to Jury Trial
- Nevada
- Kansas
- Legislation
- Anti-Subrogation Rule
- Limitation of Liability
- Landlord-Tenant
- Sutton Doctrine
- Warranty - UCC
- Waiver of Subrogation
- Uncategorized
- Massachusetts
- Certificate of Merit
- California
- Idaho
- Damages-Personal Property
- Louisiana
- Jurisdiction
- Maryland
- Colorado
- Virginia
- South Carolina
- Cargo - Transportation
- Indemnification
- Malpractice
- Causation
- Spoliation
- Tennessee
- Condemnation
- CPSC Warning
- Michigan
- Comparative-Contributory Negligence
- Contribution-Apportionment
- Rhode Island
- Product Liability
- Assignment
- Missouri
- Parties
- Public Policy
- Civil Procedure
- Res Judicata
- Damages – Personal Property
- West Virginia
- Wyoming
- Oklahoma
- Builder's Risk
- Contractual Subrogation
- Equitable Subrogation
- Georgia
- Insurable Interest
- Mississippi
- Made Whole
- Delaware
- Settlement
- Subrogation – Equitable
- Construction
- Premises Liability
- Joint or Several Liability
- Montana
- Duty
- Privity
- New Mexico
- Right to Repair Act
- Landlord
- Tenant
- Building Code
Tags
- Products Liability
- Subrogation
- Contracts
- Construction Contracts
- Construction Defects
- Statute of Limitations
- Pennsylvania
- Amazon-eBay
- Florida
- Statute of Repose
- Arizona
- Economic Loss Doctrine
- Experts
- Waiver of Subrogation
- Product Liability
- New York
- Experts – Daubert
- Improvement
- Texas
- Comparative Fault
- Arbitration
- Litigation
- Evidence
- New Jersey
- Architects-Engineers
- Indiana
- Negligence
- Illinois
- Betterment
- Minnesota
- Damages
- Louisiana
- Experts - Reliability
- Landlord-Tenant
- Chain of Distribution
- Daubert
- Failure to Warn
- CPSC Recalls; Products Liability
- Spoliation
- Limitation of Liability
- AIA Contract
- Idaho
- Loss of Use
- Vehicles
- Contracts - Enforcement
- Statute of Limitations – Discovery Rule
- Nullem Tempus
- Massachusetts
- Circumstantial Evidence
- Nevada
- Certificate of Merit
- Kansas
- Georgia
- Maryland
- Oklahoma
- Civil Procedure
- Indemnification
- Malfunction Theory
- Sutton Doctrine
- California
- Damages-Vehicles
- Jurisdiction
- Jurisdiction - Personal
- Public Policy
- Mediation
- Cyber Subrogation
- Anti-Subrogation Rule
- Tennessee
- Colorado
- Delaware
- Incorporation by Reference
- Virginia
- Negligence – Duty
- West Virginia
- Economic Loss Rule
- Negligent Undertaking
- Apportionment
- Statute of Limitations - Contractual
- Privity
- Statute of Limitations - Tolling
- Gist of the Action
- Connecticut
- Design Defect
- Malpractice
- Causation
- Made Whole
- Condemnation
- Inverse Condemnation
- Statute of Limitations - Accrual
- Settlement
- Experts – Qualifications
- Michigan
- Rhode Island
- Water Damage
- Condominiums
- Contracts - Formation
- Non-Party at Fault
- Expert Qualifications
- Amazon
- Evidence - Hearsay
- Wisconsin
- workers' compensation subrogation
- Warranty - Implied
- Malfunction Theory; Design Defect
- Independent Duty
- Ohio
- Unconscionable
- Missouri
- Parties
- Entire Controversy Doctrine
- Manufacturing Defect
- Motion to Intervene
- Pleading
- Removal
- Res Judicata
- Subrogation; High-Net-Worth; Damages; Art; Cargo-Transportation; Anti-Subrogation Rule
- Products Liability – Risk-Utility
- Lithium-ion battery
- Internet Sales
- Anti-Subrogation Rule; Wyoming; Landlord-Tenant; Sutton Doctrine
- Sanctions
- Spoliation – Fire Scene
- Builder’s Risk
- Contractual Subrogation
- Equitable Subrogation
- Exculpatory Clause
- Gross Negligence
- Insurable Interest
- Mississippi
- Standing
- Third Party
- Accepted Work
- Montana
- Independent Contractor
- New Mexico
- Res Ipsa
- Right to Repair Act
- Damages-Code Upgrades
- Statute of Limitations - Repose
- Washington
- Implied Warranty of Habitability
- Warranty - Construction
- AIA Contracts
- Anti-Indemnity Statutes
- Forum-Venue
- Joint-Tortfeasors
- Warranty – Express
- Products Liability - Foreseeability
- Cargo-Transportation
- Contribution
- MCS-90
- Substantial Completion
Authors
Archives
- August 2026
- July 2026
- June 2026
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
