In subrogation cases where the insured’s damages were caused by a defective product, the fact that the product at issue is or was subject to a recall announced by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) may help to establish that the product was defective when it left the manufacturer’s possession and control. On October 26, 2023, the CPSC announced the following recall related to a product that presents a fire hazard:
According to the CPSC’s website, “[t]he ... Continue Reading
The discovery rule applies to latent injuries, such that the statute of limitations does not begin to run until the plaintiff knows of or should have known of the injury. In Western World Ins. Group v. KC Welding, LLC, No. 2022-CA-00527-SCT, 2023 Miss. LEXIS 278 (KC Welding), a majority of the justices on the Supreme Court of Mississippi (Supreme Court) affirmed the trial court’s ruling that Western World Insurance Group (Insurer) filed its lawsuit one day late. Thus, the statute of limitations barred Insurer’s lawsuit.
In KC Welding, on July 12, 2018, KC Welding, LLC (KC Welding) sent an employee to Sunbelt Shavings, LLC (Sunbelt) to repair the door of a box containing wood chips. Sunbelt’s employees discovered that KC Welding employees were welding a storage bin that had not been emptied of wood chips and Sunbelt’s employees asked KC Welding’s employees to leave. After that, Sunbelt’s employees attempted to soak the area with water. Later than night, a fire started on Sunbelt’s property, apparently as the result of smoldering wood shavings, a fire that was extinguished on July 13, 2018.Continue Reading
In subrogation cases where the insured’s damages were caused by a defective product, the fact that the product at issue is or was subject to a recall announced by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) may help to establish that the product was defective when it left the manufacturer’s possession and control. On October 5, 2023, the CPSC announced the following recall related to a product that presents a fire hazard:
Russound Recalls MCA-88 Multizone Controller Amplifiers Due to Fire Hazard.
According to the CPSC’s website, “[t]he internal circuit board components ... Continue Reading
In April, the Supreme Court sent a list of proposed amendments to Congress that amend the Federal Rules of Evidence. Absent action by Congress, the rules go into effect December 1, 2023. The proposed amendments affect Rules 106, 615 and, relevant to this article, 702.
Rule 702 addresses testimony by an expert witness. The proposed rule reads as follows (new material is underlined; matters omitted are lined through):
A witness who is qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify in the form of an opinion or otherwise if the proponent demonstrates to the court that it is more likely than not that:
(a) the expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue;
(b) the testimony is based on sufficient facts or data;
(c) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods; and
(d) the expert has reliably applied expert’s opinion reflects a reliable application of the principles and methods to the facts of the case.Continue Reading
In subrogation cases where the insured’s damages were caused by a defective product, the fact that the product at issue is or was subject to a recall announced by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) may help to establish that the product was defective when it left the manufacturer’s possession and control. On September 28, 2023, the CPSC announced the following recall related to a product that presents a fire hazard:
Secura Recalls Air Fryers Due to Fire and Burn Hazards (Recall Alert)
According to the CPSC’s website, “[a] wire connection in the air fryer can ... Continue Reading
Recent Posts
- Rule It Out or Leave It Out: North Carolina Federal Court Limits Fire Investigator’s Testimony for Failing to Eliminate Competing Ignition Sources
- Texas Appellate Court Rejects Narrow Reading in Certificate of Merit Challenge
- Be Specific: Texas Court Holds Certificate of Merit Deficient for Collective Assertions of Negligence
Categories
- Texas
- Products Liability
- Experts - Certificate of Merit
- Certificate of Merit
- Statute of Limitations-Repose
- CPSC Recalls
- Construction Defects
- Contracts
- Florida
- Litigation
- New York
- Economic Loss Rule
- Pennsylvania
- Arizona
- Evidence
- Arbitration
- Negligence
- Experts - Reliability
- Damages
- Minnesota
- New Jersey
- AIA Contracts
- Indiana
- Comparative Fault
- Illinois
- Internet Terms
- Right to Jury Trial
- Anti-Subrogation Rule
- Nevada
- Kansas
- Legislation
- Landlord-Tenant
- Sutton Doctrine
- Limitation of Liability
- Waiver of Subrogation
- Uncategorized
- Warranty - UCC
- Massachusetts
- California
- Idaho
- Jurisdiction
- Damages-Personal Property
- Louisiana
- Maryland
- Colorado
- Virginia
- South Carolina
- Cargo - Transportation
- Malpractice
- Indemnification
- Spoliation
- Causation
- Tennessee
- Condemnation
- CPSC Warning
- Michigan
- Comparative-Contributory Negligence
- Contribution-Apportionment
- Rhode Island
- Product Liability
- Assignment
- Missouri
- Parties
- Public Policy
- Civil Procedure
- Res Judicata
- Damages – Personal Property
- West Virginia
- Wyoming
- Oklahoma
- Builder's Risk
- Contractual Subrogation
- Equitable Subrogation
- Georgia
- Insurable Interest
- Mississippi
- Made Whole
- Delaware
- Settlement
- Subrogation – Equitable
- Construction
- Premises Liability
- Joint or Several Liability
- Montana
- Duty
- Privity
- New Mexico
- Right to Repair Act
- Building Code
- Landlord
- Tenant
- Experts
- Experts – Daubert
- Fire
- Subrogation
Tags
- Texas
- Products Liability
- Certificate of Merit
- Contracts
- Construction Defects
- Construction Contracts
- Statute of Limitations
- Pennsylvania
- Statute of Repose
- Amazon-eBay
- Florida
- Product Liability
- Economic Loss Doctrine
- Waiver of Subrogation
- New York
- Arizona
- Experts – Daubert
- Improvement
- Comparative Fault
- Arbitration
- Litigation
- Evidence
- New Jersey
- Negligence
- Architects-Engineers
- Indiana
- Illinois
- Damages
- Louisiana
- Betterment
- Minnesota
- Experts - Reliability
- Landlord-Tenant
- Failure to Warn
- CPSC Recalls; Products Liability
- Chain of Distribution
- Spoliation
- Limitation of Liability
- AIA Contract
- Idaho
- Loss of Use
- Vehicles
- Contracts - Enforcement
- Statute of Limitations – Discovery Rule
- Massachusetts
- Circumstantial Evidence
- Nullem Tempus
- Georgia
- Nevada
- Kansas
- Maryland
- Civil Procedure
- Oklahoma
- Indemnification
- Malfunction Theory
- Sutton Doctrine
- California
- Jurisdiction
- Jurisdiction - Personal
- Damages-Vehicles
- Public Policy
- Mediation
- Anti-Subrogation Rule
- Cyber Subrogation
- Tennessee
- Delaware
- Colorado
- Negligence – Duty
- West Virginia
- Apportionment
- Incorporation by Reference
- Negligent Undertaking
- Virginia
- Statute of Limitations - Contractual
- Privity
- Statute of Limitations - Tolling
- Economic Loss Rule
- Connecticut
- Design Defect
- Gist of the Action
- Malpractice
- Causation
- Made Whole
- Condemnation
- Inverse Condemnation
- Settlement
- Statute of Limitations - Accrual
- Experts – Qualifications
- Michigan
- Water Damage
- Rhode Island
- Condominiums
- Contracts - Formation
- Non-Party at Fault
- Expert Qualifications
- Amazon
- Evidence - Hearsay
- Wisconsin
- workers' compensation subrogation
- Warranty - Implied
- Malfunction Theory; Design Defect
- Independent Duty
- Ohio
- Unconscionable
- Missouri
- Parties
- Manufacturing Defect
- Pleading
- Removal
- Entire Controversy Doctrine
- Motion to Intervene
- Res Judicata
- Subrogation; High-Net-Worth; Damages; Art; Cargo-Transportation; Anti-Subrogation Rule
- Products Liability – Risk-Utility
- Lithium-ion battery
- Internet Sales
- Anti-Subrogation Rule; Wyoming; Landlord-Tenant; Sutton Doctrine
- Sanctions
- Spoliation – Fire Scene
- Builder’s Risk
- Contractual Subrogation
- Equitable Subrogation
- Exculpatory Clause
- Gross Negligence
- Insurable Interest
- Mississippi
- Standing
- Third Party
- Accepted Work
- Montana
- Independent Contractor
- Res Ipsa
- New Mexico
- Right to Repair Act
- Damages-Code Upgrades
- Statute of Limitations - Repose
- Washington
- Implied Warranty of Habitability
- Warranty - Construction
- Joint-Tortfeasors
- AIA Contracts
- Anti-Indemnity Statutes
- Forum-Venue
- Warranty – Express
- Products Liability - Foreseeability
- Cargo-Transportation
- Contribution
- MCS-90
- Substantial Completion
- Daubert
- Experts
- Fire Investigation
- NFPA 921
- North Carolina
- Subrogation
Authors
Archives
- November 2026
- October 2026
- August 2026
- July 2026
- June 2026
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022