Josh Gajer Discusses How Patient Care Could Become Discoverable
Discussing a case as part of a peer review process is not entirely protected from discovery during litigation. Josh Gajer says that as a general rule, peer review protections are only going to apply if the state where the provider practices has a peer review statute on the books, the information at issue was exchanged in formal compliance with the technical requirements of the applicable statute, and the purpose of the discussion was to improve future outcomes (not to manage risk related to a prior bad outcome).
"Although the public policy rationale and general framework for peer review protection is largely similar among states that employ it, the technical details of how the protection operates can vary state to state," Josh said.
In a recent ED Management article, "Discussions on Patient Care Could Become Discoverable," Josh discusses how peer review protections must strike the right balance between the plaintiff's right to discover information and the need for providers to openly discuss care without fearing legal repercussions. Maintaining robust peer review protections are critical to ensuring hospital providers, including EPs, "can continue to engage in the type of unflinching self-criticism that promotes constant quality improvement in medicine for the betterment of all patients." (p.162)
If you would like to receive additional news alerts, event notifications, or correspondences pertaining to this and other industry-specific topics, please sign up by visiting the Subscribe page. Be sure to provide your contact information, including email address, and select the areas of practice or industries for which you would like to receive information.
This correspondence should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general informational purposes only and you are urged to consult a lawyer concerning your own situation with any specific legal question you may have.