Proposal to Cut Venue Rule in Medical Malpractice Cases Sparks Debate

By: Kim Kocher and Daniel Ferhat
The Legal Intelligencer

The Civil Procedural Rules Committee’s proposed rescission of the venue rule in medical malpractice cases has sparked spirited debate in legislative, spheres. The committee’s process is confidential. The publicly available information is limited. But, no known data supports the committee’s conclusion that the rule “no longer appears warranted,” see 48 Pa. Bulletin 7744 (Dec. 22, 2018). Health care providers, insurers, members of the defense bar and related organizations, therefore, strongly support the Supreme Court’s recent decision to defer consideration of any amendment to the rule pending the report of the Legislative Budget and Finance Committee on the potential effects of the proposed rule change.

Kim Kocher and Dan Ferhat discuss the significance of the proposed repeal of the venue rule to healthcare providers in the Commonwealth in their recent article Proposal to Cut Venue Rule in Medical Malpractice Cases Sparks Debate.

This correspondence should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general informational purposes only and you are urged to consult a lawyer concerning your own situation and legal questions.



Jump to Page

By using this site, you agree to our updated Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.