Main Menu
Print PDF

Chadbourne & Parke v. Troice: Will the Supreme Court's Narrow Statutory Interpretation Open a Wide Door to Securities Lawsuits?

Westlaw Journal: Securities Litigation & Regulation | April 3, 2014
By: Jay Shapiro

The U.S. Supreme Court issued its opinion Feb. 26 in a consolidated appeal related to the collapse of Allen Stanford’s financial network. Chadbourne & Parke v. Troice, No. 12-79; Willis of Colo. v. Troice, No. 12-86; Proskauer Rose LLP v. Troice, No. 12-88, 134 S. Ct. 1058 (Feb. 26, 2014). Significantly, the court agreed with the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that a federal statute does not bar the underlying lawsuits. Read more.

This correspondence should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general informational purposes only, and you are urged to consult a lawyer concerning your own situation and legal questions.
Back to Page