Practice Highlights
- We treat every case as if it will actually go to trial.
- We handle litigation, transactional and surety and fidelity matters.
- We represent a wide array of clients.
Practice News
- February 6, 2012
Events
- Non-Traditional Liabilities of the Surety2010
Publications
- April 18, 2012White and Williams Construction and Surety Alert
Construction and Surety
Today’s construction professional faces a myriad of complicated issues, from complex contracting and government regulation to sophisticated financing and high stakes litigation.
Our lawyers understand that a construction project has multiple moving parts, and each component must come together in order for the project to be a success. We also understand that, at times, problems such as contract defaults and terminations and property damage claims can create problems along the way.
Keeping these challenges in mind, our lawyers utilize their experience and knowledge to achieve the best possible solution for our construction industry clients. We treat every case as if it will actually go to trial. In this manner, we identify early on what our client’s greatest strengths and possible weaknesses are. This approach allows us to achieve the best possible results whether it’s settling a case, or going to trial.
What all of our various construction-related activities have in common is our commitment to aggressive and creative representation and sensible, experienced staffing, with the goal of achieving optimal results at reasonable cost to our clients.
We regularly represent owners, general contractors, subcontractors, building component manufacturers, lenders, borrowers, architectural and engineering firms and insurance and surety companies in a wide array of construction-related matters, including:
- contract drafting and negotiation
- construction management and project administration
- construction defect litigation
- claims litigation and arbitration
- all methods of alternative dispute resolution, including mediation.
Construction Litigation
Our experience in the area of construction defect litigation is nationally recognized by our clients. Our group’s construction claims experience includes litigating delay and disruption, inefficiency, defective design, extra work, and loss of business claims in federal and state courts and in arbitration on behalf of owners, contractors, subcontractors, sureties and design professionals. Whether it’s representing real estate developers or contractors in property damages cases brought by property owners alleging construction defects and component products, or serving as oversight counsel for insurance clients in construction defect cases, we have earned a reputation for identifying and controlling litigation costs, developing methods for early resolution of cases, identifying cases that are not being resolved in a timely manner, and otherwise dealing with special cases and special problems for our client.
We have tried cases throughout the country on behalf of contractors, subcontractors, and manufacturers of construction equipment involved with construction-site accidents that have resulted in major property loss and serious personal injuries. We have also regularly represented commercial property owners, real estate developers and insurance companies in litigation arising out of the alleged presence of mold and related indoor air quality issues.
We are well-versed in the filing, prosecution and defense of mechanics liens and lien foreclosures. We are also experienced in all forms of alternative dispute resolution, which is being utilized more often to resolve today's construction disputes.
Our lawyers often instruct owners, developers, construction managers and product manufacturers on such topics as loss prevention and anticipating, avoiding and handling claims.
Construction Transactions
We also have considerable experience representing various parties to major construction projects with needs such as drafting and negotiating construction contracts between owners, contractors, subcontractors, architects and engineers, financing agreements between lenders and borrowers and leasing agreements between landlords and tenants. We are licensed users of the AIA construction contract document software, which allows us to draft construction agreements quickly and efficiently.
We have negotiated workouts and have represented our clients in insolvency proceedings such as creditors' compositions and bankruptcies.
Our transactional experience includes projects financed by both private lenders and government agencies.
Our attorneys have advised insurance companies and their insureds on construction-related coverage issues arising under various types of policies, including general liability and builder's risk policies.
Surety and Fidelity
In addition to our litigation work, our lawyers have a wealth of experience in the surety and fidelity field. We represent numerous surety clients in regard to all aspects of suretyship, including drafting and enforcing indemnity agreements and equitable subrogation rights, managing defaults and takeover situations, and defending payment and performance bond claims and bad faith claims against sureties. As part of our fidelity practice, our lawyers have litigated claims involving check forgery, check kiting and other claims brought under financial institution and fiduciary bonds and commercial crime coverage policies.
Representative Matters
- Defended a local municipal utility authority against multi-million dollar delay, disruption and differing site condition claims by the contractor on the expansion of a huge wastewater treatment plant
- Defended two American surety companies against multi-million dollar bond claims regarding the construction of oil production and storage platforms in Brazil
- Represented the developer and operator of numerous assisted living facilities in Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey and Delaware, including the negotiation and drafting of purchase and sale agreements, condominium documents, financing documents, and construction contracts for the client's various facilities
Litigation
- Prosecuted and recovered on behalf of the owner of a hotel/casino in Atlantic City its delay and loss of business claims against the contractor following a major expansion project
- Defended the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDot) regarding delay, disruption, extra work and liquidated damages claims by and against the contractor for the renovation of the I-76 Schuylkill Expressway
- Defended the developer and general contractor in litigation in Baldwin County, Alabama involving multiple construction defect claims in five high-rise condominium buildings in Gulf Shores and Orange Beach, Alabama, successfully resolved a middle eight-figure case for a fraction of claimed damages, and secured substantial contributions from subcontractors, design professionals and manufacturers
- Successfully represented the contractor before the District Court and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in the leading case applying Pennsylvania law on indemnity and an additional insured's rights, in which the court ruled that a construction company, initially denied coverage by a subcontractor's insurance company, was entitled to coverage and counsel fees before the underlying case was resolved;
- Served as the litigation consultant to our insurance company client's local counsel in Austin, Texas for two years in defending a first-tier subcontractor in a multiple construction defect claim involving an entire townhouse condominium neighborhood;
- Successfully handled a nine-figure claim for alleged construction and window defects after the plaintiff had already prevailed in a claim handled by another firm
- Successfully negotiated the dismissal of a general contractor in a complex claim for construction defects, soil engineering claims and related coverage issues involving construction of a medical supplies warehouse and pharmacy facility for the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
- Served as our insurance company client's oversight counsel and negotiator in a 12 neighborhood, multi-defect construction defect lawsuit in Winter Park, Florida, resolving middle eight-figure claims against the insurer of the developer and general contractor;
- Represented a general contractor and an owner in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania in claims for contract and negligence damages brought by neighboring property owners who suffered cracking and collapse of portions of their foundations during site excavation and construction of a 170-unit mixed-use development in the Old City section of Philadelphia.
Surety and Fidelity
- Defended the surety on bond and fraud claims and prosecution of an electrical subcontractor's affirmative delay and disruption claims regarding the construction of a major hotel project in Times Square, New York City
- Represented a Philadelphia-based surety company on performance bond claims and related indemnity claims involving the multi-million dollar expansion of a retirement community in Philadelphia's suburbs
- Prosecuted on behalf of the surety a large indemnity claim following the resolution of multiple claims arising out of the construction of two luxury condominium projects in Philadelphia
- Prevailed on summary judgment in an action against an indemnitor’s secured lender as to the surety’s equitable subrogation rights to contract funds after paying a payment bond claim
- Represented a European surety, in regard to bonds written in Germany, on indemnity claims against a bankrupt American corporation and an insolvent American insurer. After litigation in Texas and New York, we obtained over $13 million for our client, after the client had previously decided that the prospects for recovery were hopeless
- Represented a surety in an action on an agreement of indemnity to recover the amounts paid by the surety in settling a performance bond claim. By a motion for summary judgment, we overcame the indemnitors' arguments that the surety was not entitled to any recovery because its settlement of the performance bond claim was not made in good faith
- Successfully represented a surety in an action against an owner who released contract funds without the surety's consent. This release of funds deprived the surety of its interest in the contract funds, which would have reimbursed the surety for claims that it had to pay against its payment bond. The owner was required to pay to the surety that amount that it had released to the surety's principal without the surety's consent
Transactional
- Drafted, on behalf of an owner/developer in Bryan, Texas, all necessary construction agreements with the replacement contractor following the default/termination of the original contractor
- Drafted all construction contracts, on a nationwide basis, for the largest distributor of industrial, medical, and specialty gases and related equipment in the United States
- Represented an American engineering and specialty construction firm in contract drafting and negotiations with the government of the Ukraine for the multi-million dollar, high profile permanent remediation of the Chernobyl nuclear disaster site
- Represented an engineering and construction firm in contract negotiation and disputes with subcontractors and with public utility owners for multi-million dollar installation and refurbishment of hydro-electric power plants around the country and abroad
News
Events
- Non-Traditional Liabilities of the Surety2010 National Bond Claims Association Annual Meeting2010
- The Crisis of Sub Prime Guarantees in the USA2008 Pan American Surety Association General Assembly Meeting2008
- The Katrina Effect: Dealing With The Coverage and Litigation AftermathIntermediaries and Reinsurance Underwriter’s Association Claims Workshop2006
- Tricks, Traps And Ploys Used In Construction SchedulingLorman Seminar2005
- Surety, Principal and Beneficiary: Where Do Responsibilities Stand?, Panel Moderator2005 Pan American Surety Association General Assembly Meeting2005
- The Surety’s Right to Settle – What Are We Afraid Of?, Panel Moderator2004 National Bond Claims Association Annual Meeting2004
- Construction Defect Claims and Liability CoveragePhiladelphia, PAOctober 2003
Publications
- April 18, 2012White and Williams Construction and Surety Alert
- January 13, 2012White and Williams Construction and Surety Alert
- November 14, 2011White and Williams Construction and Surety News Alert
- Typical Surety Bond Defenses Under United States Law
- The United States Stimulus Spending Package and its Impact on the Surety Bond Market
- The Surety’s Various Options Under a U.S. Performance Bond
- So You’ve Written a Construction Performance Bond in the United States – For What Damages Can You Be Liable?
- Residential Fire Sprinklers: Putting a Damper on a New Building Code Provision
- Pennsylvania One Call Approves a New Voluntary Alternative Dispute Resolution Process for Utility Owners and Demolition/Excavation Conctractors
- Conditions Precedent in U.S. Construction Bonds – A Simple Demand For Payment Will Not Work
- Third Circuit Clarifies Azzarello and the Admissibility of Risk-Utility Evidence
- The Future of Negligence Claims in Products Liability Cases After Phillips
- The Future of Implied Warranty of Merchantability Claims in Product Liability Cases After Phillips II
- Supreme Court Rejects Implied Warranty and Punitive Damages Claims in Phillips
- Product Liability: How Businesses Can Protect Themselves and Reduce Their Risk
- Pennsylvania Supreme Court to Consider Adopting Restatement (Third) of Torts
- March 2011
- Summer 2010
- Construction Services Employers Beware: The Delaware Workplace Fraud Act is Now LawMay 2010
- May 19, 2010
- April 1, 2010Construction Practices News Alert
- April 2010Construction Practices News Alert
- March 2010Construction Practices News Alert
- March 2010Construction Practices News Alert
- December 18, 2009
- December 7, 2009
- November 10, 2009
- November 5, 2009
- Fall/Winter 2009
- September 24, 2009
- July 8, 2009
- A Word to the Wise: Be Careful With Your Advice
- May 26, 2009
- May 8, 2009
- April 20, 2009
- March 30, 2009
- Product Liability UpdateOctober 2007
- Product Liability UpdateSeptember 2006
- Product Liability UpdateJuly 1, 2005
- Product Liability UpdateJuly 2004
Practice Contacts
- Jerrold Anders, Co-Chair
215.864.7003 | Email | vCard - William Taylor, Co-Chair
215.864.6305 | Email | vCard

