Our E-commerce attorneys provide a broad range of services including registration, transactional, and litigation in the areas of intellectual property, Internet matters, privacy, and regulatory compliance. We have extensive experience in risk management of intellectual property assets, as well as enhancement of those assets.

Areas of experience include:

• Registration of Trademarks
• Registration of Copyrights
• Protection of Trade Secrets
• Protection of Trade Dress
• Website Development Agreements
• Website Notices and Privacy Analysis
• Risk Assessment for Online Content
• Intellectual Property Licensing

Recent Matters:

1. Full House Marketing of New Jersey vs. Ronald Gohr
   Superior Ct. of NJ, Chancery Division, Burlington County
   Docket No. C-67-99

   This matter was tried to verdict in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Burlington County. The dispute arose from a Franchise Agreement which permitted use of various registered trademarks which became a substantial asset for our client during the life of the franchise. The Franchisor failed to protect the trademarks and the ultimate issue for our client, the Franchisee, was its ability to recapture these valuable marks and control their usage in the marketplace. Our application for both injunctive relief and damages was successful.

2. Dean Harris, David Yates, and Miguel Clarke v. Jay Yogeshwar, Vanita Balachandran, Front Porch Video, Inc. and Front Porch Digital, Inc.
   U.S.D.C. For Eastern District of Pennsylvania, No. 00-DV-5441

   This case arose out of a "corporate divorce" in which the most valuable property in dispute was technology in the video taping industry for dramatic arts. Our client prevailed in his application for injunctive relief to protect the intellectual property assets and achieved a satisfactory settlement.

3. OM Association, Inc. v. Creative Competitions, Inc. a/k/a CCI
   U.S.D.C. For District of New Jersey

   This matter was litigated in the U.S.D.C. for the District of New Jersey where we represented a corporation which licensed from the other party intellectual property assets comprised of problems in creativity for students. Both copyright and trademark law were at issue in resolving ambiguous contracts and an interlocking corporate directorate. Ultimately, the matter was settled to our clients satisfaction.